Birthdate: July 21st, 1980 (29 years old)
Bio:
compromise your personal comfort for social consciousness, and godbless.
|
| |
|
highdileeho Member Profile Real Name: Andrew Birthdate: July 21st, 1980 (29 years old) Bio: compromise your personal comfort for social consciousness, and godbless. Member Since: 2008-02-07 Last Power Points used: never • Available: now Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now Comments 1 |
Subscribe Navigation
Member Stats Rank: 517 Rating: 8 star points #1 Videos: 1 Top 15 Videos: 2 Votes Received: 370 Average Votes Per Video: 46.25 Votes Cast: 56 Comments Posted: 77 • browse Comments Applauded: 1 Sifted Videos: 8 Profile Views: 1893 Highest Ranked Comments Member's Highest Rated Videos |
In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
try to find "the bently boys": down on penny's farm. Great original, from wich Dylan kinda "borrowed" re-arranged and formed maggies farm. The only reason I believe dylan stole the song is because the lyrics imply the same metaphor and values. The original is a little better. Not trying to troll, just saying, check out the original. Its an amazing song....I found a link to the song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_9_kp8HPfA
I got to say, Astrophysicists are the creationist of the scientific community. Almost every single modern theory regarding this subject is completly untestable. And in every other scientific discipline you cannot even create a hypothesis unless it is 'testable' let alone assert it as being a theory. Try publishing an ecological journal without signifigant testable data to back you up; It would be your last. You certainly wouldn't be visited by nerds, sipping wine at a vineyard talking about your insane ramblings. A theory based on what? the fact that another scientist cannot test it to be false simply because it is physiclly impossible? That logic is exactly aligned with religions 'faith' based principles that we all love to bash so freely. I think We can only say that certain sub-atomic and atomic particles react a peticular way. But making wild assertins as to how, why, and how we can manipulate those wild assertions is where we all went astray. I blame Einsteen, He duped the entire world, and became an icon to astrophysicists. So now they all follow his very arrogant and presumptious methodology. Being right 2 or 3 times when you were wrong hundreds is a terrible ratio for any scientist...well except for...you know fake scientists like these guys. ohhh snap, ecologists talking trash...what Son! We run this bitch!
And Relying soley on Mathamatics it very very faulty. Even newton who was thinking way beyond the scale of any measurable device was innovative enough to create devices to test his hypothosis'ss's. The bottom line is, it's not a theory unless you can repeatedly test a hypothosis as being true, beyond crunching numbers. Face it, you can bend any number into another to bolster a pre-existing concept. So I don't want to hear any rebuttle about how this is different because the scale is so much more vast than 'typical' science.
A guy named Jim would be one of five people who know this story, if that counts!
In reply to this comment by highdileeho
In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
Thanks for putting me on to this guy, Brilliant. i went on youtube. There was a long documentary about 90 minutes. It was the history of his joke telling, with a smattering of an autobiography mixed in. He is a brilliant comic, definitly one of the best, top 3. He had me rolling with laughter for 90 minutes. the 1 when he talks about taking a shit when he worked in the shipyard and beating out his flaming pubic hair with a hammer: so funny ...here's a link to the first bit. . Thanks again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF_bFPMZy6Q
In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
http://www.saveourearth.co.uk/soe_rainf.php?id=2
This is a nice list and description of other industries that are responsible for the deforestation.
In reply to this comment by MINK:
who are the other contributors?
similar to yours hidileho, hope you find it interestign.